The Woes of California

Responding to a discussion of CA's woes at http://www.truthout.org/060909T#comment-58675, I wrote:
As another ex-resident who loved CA in the 70s, I have thought a lot about what's up there. The question is not why 12% of voters voted as they did, but why so few turned out. I think there are two factors at work: 1. The voters are silently revolting against the pay and benefits that the public sector receives, enormous, non-negotiable and relentless costs, since the state employee unions won't budge, that can only be reduced by the bankruptcy of the state. I think that's what a lot of people really want. 2. The wealthy who live in their gated communities have not yet been touched by the financial distress hitting everyone else. They have no concept of what the destruction of the state will do to them personally, and they believe, I think mistakenly, that their private measures can largely protect them. Until they get a reality check, CA will continue to see their $ and votes aligned against the public interest.

Israeli Settlements

Israel’s problem is that, confronted by a terrifying situation, its political leaders and opinion-makers have for decades mostly followed the dictates of their gibbering guts rather than the promptings of their rational minds. Fear-mongering is good politics, but when it leads to treating the Palestinians in needlessly humiliating fashion, blatantly disregarding the UN and other international bodies, and looking to all the world (except its diehard defenders and apologists) like a neighborhood bully, it’s lousy diplomacy. And for Israel that could be fatal, given that time is not on its side. Bush was like an alcoholic’s drinking buddy (”Hey, I’m with you all the way. You want another shot? Go for it!” Obama is Israel’s best friend, not its drinking buddy, and probably its last hope.

Response to WSJ letter attacking Sotomayor

Professor Graglia,
It is a sad thing to see a lawyer, a law professor at that, so strangely distort logic and language as you do in your unfortunate letter. You misquote Judge Sotomayor (she said she would HOPE that...). You compare her noting a lack of Hispanics in heavily Hispanic states to the lack of Italians or Greeks in those same states, a logic that totally escapes me. And you abuse the respect and deference that would normally be due to a law professor when you write for publication such a prejudiced and misleading letter.

For shame, sir,